Supreme Court determines Uber drivers are workers

In a landmark decision handed out by the Supreme Court last week, the respondents, Yaseen Aslam, James Farrer, Robert Dawson and others have had their claim upheld that they are “workers” and not self-employed drivers for Uber; as such they qualify for rights under the Employment Rights Act, the Minimum Wage Act and Working Time Regulations.

This will have significant repercussions for firms like Uber who engage persons to work for them under contracts that aim to deny them “workers” rights by treating them as self-employed.

 

A summary of the main points that will flow from this judgement are set out below:

  • In future, Tribunals (lower courts) should look at the reality of the relationship between parties rather than simply accept any documentation (contracts) between the parties.
  • Drivers should be considered “workers” as soon as they switch on their apps until apps are switched off.

This is likely to mean that:

  • Drivers will be able to claim minimum wage based on their entire working day not just when they had customers in their cabs.
  • Drivers should be able to claim back-pay.
  • They should also be able to claim 5.6 weeks paid annual leave.

This outcome will affect the rulings of lower courts for many years to come if asked to consider the rights of individuals retained in the so-called “gig” economy.

Latest Blog
02
Dec

Tax Diary December 2021/January 2022

1 December 2021 – Due date for corporation tax payable for the year ended 28 Fe...

Read More
02
Dec

Budget bad news 27 October 2021

Readers should take note of the following changes: Income Tax Allowances frozen: The ...

Read More
02
Dec

Budget bonuses 27 October 2021

There was little good cheer in the Chancellor’s announcements to parliament on ...

Read More
02
Dec

Business gifts and tax

Business gifts are not allowed as a tax deduction against profits. The legislation tr...

Read More

CONTACT SIMON COOPER